Eastwest MedicoContact sales
Logistics

Incoterms® 2020: DAP, DPU and DDP for delivered PPE supply

The D-terms put the seller in charge of the whole journey. The differences come down to who unloads and who pays import duty – and DDP has a VAT problem.

Niels Kristian BitschDecember 19, 20224 min read
Incoterms® 2020: DAP, DPU and DDP for delivered PPE supply – Eastwest Medico

The D-terms put the seller in charge of the whole journey. For a hospital or an agency that wants one price, one invoice and no logistics department, they are usually the right answer. The differences between the three come down to two questions: who unloads, and who pays the import duty.

There are three, not two. DPU was renamed from DAT in the 2020 edition and is often left out of comparisons.

DAP – Delivered at Place

The seller delivers when the goods are placed at the buyer's disposal at the named destination, ready for unloading but not unloaded. The seller bears all cost and risk to that point, including main carriage and export clearance.

The buyer unloads, and the buyer imports. Import clearance, duty and VAT are the buyer's responsibility under DAP.

For deliveries within the EU customs union there is no import clearance, which is why DAP behaves like a simple delivered price on intra-EU movements and is the term we normally use for framework deliveries to Danish and other EU institutions.

DPU – Delivered at Place Unloaded

Identical to DAP with one difference: the seller unloads the goods at the named destination, and risk passes after unloading.

It is the only Incoterm that requires the seller to unload. That makes it useful where the receiving site has no loading dock or handling equipment – field warehouses, clinics, temporary storage in a humanitarian deployment – and a liability trap where the seller has no means of unloading at an unfamiliar site. Name the destination precisely.

DDP – Delivered Duty Paid

Maximum seller obligation. The seller delivers at the named destination ready for unloading, having cleared the goods for both export and import and paid all duties and taxes.

DDP produces the cleanest possible buyer experience: one price, no customs exposure, no unexpected charges. It is also the term most likely to go wrong, for a reason that has nothing to do with logistics.

The VAT problem. Import VAT is normally recoverable by the importer of record. Under DDP, the importer of record is the seller – a foreign entity that frequently cannot register for, or reclaim, VAT in the destination country. That irrecoverable VAT is then priced into the goods, and the buyer pays it as unrecoverable cost rather than reclaiming it as input tax. A DDP price can therefore be materially worse value than a DAP price plus the buyer's own recoverable import VAT, even though it looks simpler.

The ICC's guidance reflects this: DDP should be used only where the seller can, directly or indirectly, obtain import clearance in the destination country. Where the buyer can reclaim VAT and the seller cannot, DAP with the buyer as importer of record is usually the better commercial outcome.

Which to use

DAP
DPU
DDP
Seller unloads
No
Yes
No
Export clearance
Seller
Seller
Seller
Import clearance
Buyer
Buyer
Seller
Duty and import VAT
Buyer
Buyer
Seller
Risk passes
At destination, before unloading
After unloading
At destination, before unloading

Practical guidance for institutional procurement:

Intra-EU delivery: DAP. No import formalities, and a single delivered price.
Receiving site without handling equipment: DPU, with the destination named precisely.
Import into a country where the buyer can reclaim VAT: DAP, buyer as importer of record.
Import where the buyer wants zero customs involvement and cannot reclaim VAT anyway: DDP, having checked the seller can actually clear the goods.

For institutional buyers we normally quote DAP on our product range, which gives a single landed price without customs exposure. For the opposite end of the range, where the buyer controls freight and the price is lowest, see EXW and FOB. For the middle ground where the seller pays freight but the buyer carries the risk, see CIF and CIP.

The eleven Incoterms® 2020 rules

Rule
Mode
Risk passes
Seller pays carriage to
EXW – Ex Works
Any
At seller's premises, before loading
Nothing
FCA – Free Carrier
Any
On delivery to carrier
Named place
FAS – Free Alongside Ship
Sea
Alongside the vessel
Port of shipment
FOB – Free on Board
Sea
On board the vessel
Port of shipment
CFR – Cost and Freight
Sea
On board the vessel
Destination port
CIF – Cost, Insurance and Freight
Sea
On board the vessel
Destination port, insured (C)
CPT – Carriage Paid To
Any
On delivery to first carrier
Named destination
CIP – Carriage and Insurance Paid To
Any
On delivery to first carrier
Named destination, insured (A)
DAP – Delivered at Place
Any
At destination, ready for unloading
Named destination
DPU – Delivered at Place Unloaded
Any
At destination, after unloading
Named destination
DDP – Delivered Duty Paid
Any
At destination, ready for unloading
Named destination, duties paid

Incoterms® is a registered trademark of the International Chamber of Commerce. The rules in force are Incoterms® 2020, published September 2019 and effective from 1 January 2020. A contract that does not name the edition is ambiguous, because the 2010 rules remain valid if the parties specify them – always write the rule, the named place and the edition: `FOB Port Klang, Incoterms® 2020`.

Related: EXW and FOB · CIF and CIP · DAP and DDP

Key takeaways

There are three D-terms: DAP, DPU and DDP. DPU was renamed from DAT in Incoterms® 2020.
Only DPU obliges the seller to unload.
DAP and DPU leave import clearance, duty and VAT with the buyer. DDP moves all of it to the seller.
DDP's weakness is irrecoverable import VAT: a foreign seller often cannot reclaim it, so it gets priced into the goods.
For intra-EU framework deliveries, DAP gives a single delivered price with no customs complication.
Niels Kristian Bitsch, managing director of Eastwest Medico ApS
Niels Kristian BitschManaging director, Eastwest Medico ApS

Seventeen years sourcing and supplying medical gloves and PPE to governments, UN agencies, NGOs and healthcare systems. Writes on glove standards, quality management and responsible sourcing for institutional buyers, working from the source standards rather than secondary summaries.

View profile on LinkedIn

Related reading

All articles →
Shipping disruption and glove supply: the Red Sea, the Panama Canal and Hormuz – Eastwest Medico
Logistics
Shipping disruption and glove supply: the Red Sea, the Panama Canal and Hormuz
January 30, 2024
Storing nitrile gloves so the declared shelf life still means something – Eastwest Medico
Logistics
Storing nitrile gloves so the declared shelf life still means something
August 20, 2023
Incoterms® 2020: CIF and CIP, and the insurance difference that matters – Eastwest Medico
Logistics
Incoterms® 2020: CIF and CIP, and the insurance difference that matters
December 8, 2022